This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Upon arrival to the emergencydepartment, a senior emergency physician looked at the ECG and said "Nothing too exciting." Just because you don't see hemodynamically significant CAD on angiogram does not mean it is not OMI. I could have told you this (and did tell you this) without an MRI.
Patient stated that he has had glucose over 400 even though he has not missed any doses of insulin. Lead aVL in ECG #2 now shows subtle-but-real coved ST depression, that is the mirror-image opposite picture of the new coved ST elevation that we now see in lead III.
She was unable to be defibrillated but was cannulated and placed on ECMO in our EmergencyDepartment (ECLS - extracorporeal life support). A followup ECG was recorded 2 days later: No definite evidence of infarction. If there is any evidence of atherosclerosis, modifiable CAD risk factors should be treated aggressively.
Submitted and written by Alex Bracey with edits by Pendell Meyers and Steve Smith Case A 50ish year old man with a history of CAD w/ prior LAD MI s/p LAD stenting presented to the ED with chest pain similar to his prior MI, but worse. Lead aVL, for example, has a definite J-wave. Stat echo would also be helpful. mV compared to 0.05-0.1
Written by Jesse McLaren, with comments from Smith An 85 year old with a history of CAD presented with 3 hours of chest pain that feels like heartburn but that radiates to the left arm. Below is the ECG. What do you think? There’s sinus bradycardia, first degree AV block, normal axis, delayed R wave progression, and normal voltages.
She presented to the EmergencyDepartment at around 3.5 The procedure was described as very complex due to severe multivessel CAD, but ultimately PCI was successfully performed to the ostial LCX. Final Diagnosis: "STEMI" (of course, as you can see in the ECGs above, this is not true, by definition this was NSTEMI.
Case A 68 year old man with a medical history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and CAD with stent deployment in the RCA presented to the emergencydepartment with chest pain. And so was missed "golden opportunity" to make a definitive diagnosis long before the 11 hours that it ultimately took to get this patient to the cath lab.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content