This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Many of the changes seen are reminiscent of LVH with “strain,” and downstream Echo may very well corroborate such a suspicion, but since the ECG isn’t the best tool for definitively establishing the presence of LVH, we must favor a subendocardial ischemia pattern, instead. He awoke earlier that morning in his usual state of health.
Note that as many as 7% of patients with acute coronary syndrome have chest pain reproducible on palpation [Lee, Solomon]. which reduces the pre-test probability of acute coronary syndrome by less than 30% [McGee]. In an attempt to clarify language, a consensus definition was developed. Back to the case. ECG 2 What do you think?
The acute coronary syndrome work-up is negative but she is Well’s high and needs a CTPA to rule-out a pulmonary embolism. Part of the difficulty with this topic is the inconsistent definition of contrast-induced nephropathy. A common definition is an increase in creatinine level by 25% or an absolute increase of 0.3
Differentiating between the two is difficult as multiple proposed diagnostic criteria have yet to demonstrate sufficient sensitivity or specificity for a definitive diagnosis. Risk factors that increase the likelihood of VT include history of previous myocardial infarction, known coronary artery disease, and structural heart disease.
Dr. Smith and other authors showed the utility of Speckle Tracking Strain Echo in this case report: Diagnosis of acute coronary occlusion in patients with non–STEMI by point-of-care echocardiography with speckle tracking Repeat ECG: Slightly less hyperacute T waves, likely indicating improving flow compared to the first ECG.
What lowered my confidence in calling ECG #1 a definite OMI — was the finding of somewhat similar-appearing , upright T waves with slight-but-real J-point ST elevation in so many leads ( ie, leads I,II,aVF; V2-thru-V6 ). Once I identified leads V4 and V5 as definitely abnormal — I looked closer at neighboring leads.
The ECG does not show any definite signs of ischemia. Why Was Cardiac Cath Negative for Coronary Disease? Use ß-blockers with caution ( as they may aggravate coronary spasm ). Given the potential triggering effect of smoking on coronary spasm — absolute abstinence from smoking is essential! The below ECG was recorded.
Category 1 : Sudden narrowing of a coronary artery due to ACS (plaque rupture with thrombosis and/or downstream showering of platelet-fibrin aggregates. It’s judicious, then, to arrange for coronary angiogram. Supply-demand mismatch (non-occlusive coronary disease, or exacerbation of preexisting flow insufficiency) a.
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest presenting to the ED in refractory VF, a majority have significant coronary artery disease, much of which is amenable to percutaneous coronary intervention. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a commonly encountered entity in U.S.
But cardiac arrest is a period of near zero flow in the coronary arteries and causes SEVERE ischemia. Confirmation of sinus tachycardia should be easy to verify when the heart rate slows a little bit ( as the patient's condition improves ) — allowing clearer definition between the T and P waves.
Author: Brit Long, MD (@long_brit) // Reviewed by Alex Koyfman, MD (@EMHighAK) The American Heart Association 2023 Guideline for managing cardiac arrest or life-threatening toxicity due to poisoning was recently released. This post will focus on the key parts of the guideline that affect ED evaluation and management. Top 10 Take Home Pearls 1.
Past medical history includes coronary stenting 17 years prior. Cardiology was consulted and the patient underwent coronary angiogram which showed diffuse severe three-vessel disease. Coronary angiogram shows diffuse severe three-vessel disease. Definitive diagnosis that ECG #1 is in fact VT is more than academic.
Emergency physicians have recognized for some time that there are many occlusions of the coronary arteries that do not present with classic STEMI criteria on the ECG. This included the addition several new STEMI equivalents [4] on ECG that warrant “prompt evaluation for emergency coronary angiography.”
This new ECG was still interpreted as STEMI and the patient was taken to the cath lab where the angiogram showed completely normal coronary arteries throughout. Smith : this ECG is definitely not OMI, but could be mistaken for Swirl pattern, which is a septal OMI with STE in V1 and STD in V6. Unfortunately no echo was available.
Old ‘NSTEMI’ A history of coronary artery disease and a stent to the same territory further increases pre-test likelihood of acute coronary occlusion, including in-stent thrombosis. So the patient had a transient acute coronary occlusion that spontaneously reperfused but is at risk for reocclusion. Deutch et al.
More past history: hypertension, tobacco use, coronary artery disease with two vessel PCI to the right coronary artery and circumflex artery several years prior. Suppose the OMI had been recognized, or suppose another ECG had been recorded and it showed definite OMI. He reports feeling nauseated with emesis.
Before the lab values returned this patient had a n emergent coronary CT angiogram done that ruled out CAD. A false positive cath lab activation is also off course acceptable for this diagnosis if you cannot get an emergent coronary CT angiogram. Each main coronary artery (LAD, RCA and LCx) are shown in separate images.
The commonest causes of MINOCA include: atherosclerotic causes such as plaque rupture or erosion with spontaneous thrombolysis, and non-atherosclerotic causes such as coronary vasospasm (sometimes called variant angina or Prinzmetal's angina), coronary embolism or thrombosis, possibly microvascular dysfunction. This is not the case.
He reported a history of ischemic cardiomyopathy with coronary stent placement approximately 10 years prior, but could not recall the specific artery involved. 1, 2] The most clinically useful definition to account for this entire constellation is intraventricular conduction delay. The respective hospital course was unremarkable.
When I saw the ECG of this patient I saw that there was definitely something "off". The patient was referred for coronary angiography which did not reveal any atherosclerotic changes. A formal echo at the PCI center after coronary angiography revealed a large septal and apical WMA. Troponin I peaked at 769 ng/L.
As per Dr. McLaren — today's patient was lucky in that the acute coronary occlusion spontaneously reperfused — and the patient remained pain-free. There’s clear T wave inversion in III/aVF, which is reciprocal to subtle ST elevation and hyperacute T waves in I/aVL (broad, symmetric, and larger than the entire QRS in aVL).
Thus, this does NOT meet STEMI criteria (though, as of 2022, it is a formal "STEMI equivalent", assuming everyone agrees that this is de Winter morphology, for which there is currently no objective definition). Even if a patient's ECG does meet STEMI criteria, it may not be perceived so. What a farce.
A CT Coronary angiogram was ordered. Here are the results: --Minimally obstructive coronary artery disease. --LAD Although a lesion is not visible anatomically on this CT scan, coronary catheter angiography could be considered based on Cardiology evaluation." A repeat troponin returned at 0.45 CAD-RADS category 1. --No
Thanks in part to rapid bedside diagnosis, the patient was able to avoid emergent coronary angiography. Consider the following: We become attuned to looking for acute coronary occlusion in patients who present with acute symptoms to the ED ( E mergency D epartment ). What do you do clinically when the ECG looks like this?
Although predicting the "culprit" artery of acute coronary occlusion is often straightforward ( ie, based on the distribution of leads with ST elevation and leads with reciprocal ST depression ) — this is not always the case. See Discussion in the June 29, 2024 post of Dr. Smith' ECG Blog ). The April 8, 2022 post by Drs.
It shows a proximal LAD occlusion, in conjunction with a subtotally occluded LMCA ( Left Main Coronary Artery ). Upon contrast injection of the LMCA, the patient deteriorated, as the LMCA was severely diseased and flow to all coronary arteries ( LAD, LCx and RCA ) was compromised. There is no definite evidence of acute ischemia. (ie,
They are not premature, by definition. A 12 Lead ECG was recorded secondary to bizarre telemetry findings at bedside. From afar, there is gross tachycardia, cadence irregularities, and narrow QRS complexes that may, or may not, be Sinus in origin; and finally – a cacophony of wide complexes that might very well be ventricular in origin.
However , this patient is having chest discomfort, and by definition then she should be considered not to be stable. The patient is an older woman with known coronary disease and an ICD-Pacemaker implanted because of a history of VT ( V entricular T achycardia ). Is this: 1. In either case, prompt cardioversion is indicated.
Upon further research in the 1970’s, retrospective data from autopsies of those patients showed coronary aneurysms 5 Pathophysiology: Kawasaki Disease is a vasculitis of medium sized arteries. Tomisaku Kawasaki, who noticed 50+ similar pediatric presentations between the years 1961 and 1967.
A 56 year old male with a history of diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and coronary artery disease presented to the emergency department with sudden onset weakness, fatigue, lethargy, and confusion. This is another case sent by the undergraduate (who is applying to med school) who works as an EKG tech. No ECG was ordered on Day #1.
The T-waves are not definitively hyperacute. There is definite v oltage for LVH. Clearly, more information is needed before a definite decision can be reached — but the “onus of proof” is on the clinician to rule out acute LAD occlusion. There is a small amount of STE in V2 and V3, with a very small amount of STD in V4-V6.
See the variety of Left Main Occlusion ECGs here: How does Acute Total Left Main Coronary occlusion present on the ECG? == MY Comment , by K EN G RAUER, MD ( 5/3 /2024 ): == Most patients with acute LMain Occlusion do not survive to make it to the hospital. There is STE in aVR. Thus, there is high lateral OMI with diffuse ST depression.
It definitely does not fulfill STEMI criteria, and I would argue that it would not lead to cath lab activation in most centers. All coronary arteries were patent without atherosclerotic change. Only after troponin returned elevated was an Echo was done, revealing a definite wall motion abnormality.
By definition, this is a non-STEMI because there is not 1 mm of ST elevation in 2 consecutive leads. However, ST elevation is only an imperfect surrogate for complete acute persistent occlusion of an epicardial coronary artery without collateral circulation. male presents because he "thought he might be having a heart attack."
Finally — there is the clinical reality that a patient who has a "baseline" ECG that manifests a repolarization variant — may at some point develop acute coronary occlusion that in part is masked by benign-appearing ECG characteristics of the underlying repolarization variant. It is clearly missed by the conventional algorithm.
Angiogram: Severe two-vessel coronary artery disease with possible co-culprits (90% proximal circumflex, 70% mid/distal RCA) in the setting of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Marked ST depression from multi-vessel coronary disease serves to attentuate what would have been ST elevation in leads II and aVF ).
Aside on ECG Research: 20% of Definite diagnostic STEMI (Cox et al.) have perfect coronary flow by the time of angiogram. Serial tracings often show “ dynamic ” ST-T wave changes — which in a patient with CP, allow prompt definitive diagnosis that might not have been obvious with just a single tracing.
Therefore, this does not meet the definition of myocardial infarction ( 4th Universal Definition of MI ), which requires at least one troponin above the 99% reference range. You can see the deficiency of the definition of MI. Because there is reciprocal ST depression in aVL, this should not be called early repol. But maybe not.
Serial ECGs enhance the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. Although recognition of OMI was not affected by administration of morphine in this case, use caution with analgesia in ongoing ACS without a definitive plan for angiography. This can occur due to scar ( e.g. post infarct VT) or anatomical variants ( e.g. AVNRT or AVRT).
There is maybe no definite answer and arguments can be made for the different scenarios. An MRi was not done for this patient and a definite answer maybe cannot be obtained. with the important message that sometimes ( especially in retrospect! ) — a definite diagnosis can not be made. The ECG shows sinus rhythm.
Thus, there are some suspicious abnormalities, but no definite signs of ischemia. But the definition misses the point. It is a coronary occlusion with a substantial myocardial territory at risk, that showed only very subtle ST changes. There are thin and normal inferior Q-waves. It is very subtle but real.
The 50-something patient with history of coronary stenting and slightly reduced LV ejection fraction. There is definite reperfusion. which would suggest reduced rates of major adverse cardiac events with coronary artery bypass grafting." He had been smoking an opiate and suddenly collapsed. He was ventilated with BVM on arrival.
In most cases, rather, the culprit is gross ischemia due to myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, or advanced coronary artery disease. 4-6] In figures 1-4, specifically during the episodes of NSVT, there is a mostly regular cadence with preserved definition of both QRS and T. hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia], and/or 3) CNS dysfunction.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content