This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The conventional machine algorithm interpreted this ECG as STEMI. See this post of RV MI with both McConnell sign and "D" sign: Inferior and Posterior STEMI. Here is lead I from ECGs 1 and 2 shown side-by-side to highlight the change in axis from borderline right to completely normal. Her ECG is shown below: What do you think?
link] A 62 year old man with a history of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and carotid artery stenosis called 911 at 9:30 in the morning with complaint of chest pain. Challenge QUESTION: The relative change in T-QRS-D is not the only thing that changes during period of time that passed between recording of the 2 ECGs shown in Figure-1.
== MY Comment , by K EN G RAUER, MD ( 8/30 /2024 ): == I was sent the ECG shown in Figure-1 — knowing only that the patient was being seen in the ED ( E mergency D epartment ). Figure-1: The initial ECG in today's case. After seeing ECG #2 — Can you explain: i ) Why no negative P wave was seen in lead V1 of ECG #1? —
Post cath ECG: Now there are hyperacute T-waves again, and recurrent ST depression in V2 This ECG would normally diagnostic of OMI until proven otherwise No further troponins were measured, but it looks like there is recurrent OMI Next day: A CT Coronary Angiogram was done (CTCA) CARDIAC MORPHOLOGY AND FUNCTION: 1. IMPRESSION: 1.
A prior ECG from 1 month ago was available: The presentation ECG was interpreted as STEMI and the patient was transferred emergently to the nearest PCI center. Patients that develop a Type 1 pattern without any precipitating or provoking factors have a risk of SCD of 0.5-0.8% per year incidence of SCD in this cohort [1].
Furthermore, the term "STEMI equivalent" has no reliable or definable meaning except between two practitioners who both agree on the list of entities that they believe are STEMI equivalents and can agree on how to identify it. Obvious inferoposterior STEMI. J ACC 61(4):e78-140; page e83.
A 40-something male presented with dyspnea and left arm numbness, and perhaps some chest tightness, for 11/2 hours. This is all but diagnostic of STEMI, probably due to wraparound LAD The cath lab was activated. You can see the deficiency of the definition of MI. E CG # 1 = the initial Triage ECG ( TOP ) — As per Dr.
There is an obvious inferior posterior STEMI(+) OMI. We recorded an ECG in which V1-V3 were put in the position of V4R-V6R, and V4-6 were placed in V7-9 to (academically) confirm posterior OMI. 1 mg of Atropine was given and the heart rate increased transiently to 60. What is the atrial activity? How would one tell? What to do?
Post Cath ECG: Obviously completing MI with LVA morphology, and STE that meets STEMI criteria (but pt is still diagnosed as "NSTEMI"). Day 12 ECG: FINAL DIAGNOSIS: "NSTEMI" Despite the fact that his day 4 ECG easily meets STEMI criteria, the patient is diagnosed as NSTEMI. No TIMI flow was listed in the report.
He had episodes of chest pain off and on all night, until about 1 hour prior to arrival when the pain became constant, crushing, 10/10 chest pain that radiated to both arms. Barely any STE, and thus not meeting STEMI criteria. Only now that the patient has STEMI criteria is he allowed to go to the cath lab, at around 0530.
There is STE in III and aVF which does not meet STEMI criteria due to insufficient STE in lead aVF. The interventionalists insisted that the ECGs did not meet STEMI criteria and cancelled the activation, stating that they would consider urgent cath after further stabilization. This is an obvious inferoposterior OMI. mm STE with 9.5
But these cases show the potential dangers of delayed recognition and treatment of inferior reperfusion Take away 1. Rather than using terms like “STEMI” and “Wellens”, it’s more helpful to describe the underlying pathology and ECG pattern pattern: Occlusion MI, and reperfusion T wave inversion 4. JAMA Intern Med 2019 9.
A "STEMI alert" was called and soon cancelled. Comment by K EN G RAUER, MD ( 3/1 /2023 ): = Today's case by Dr. Meyers serves as a reminder of the important clinical entity known as diffuse subendocardial ischemia. ST depression will not always be present in 9/12 leads — as is seen in Figure-1.
The pattern of STE and STD reminded us of Brugada Type 1 morphology. Smith comment: 1) Brugada ECG may have ST shifts in limb leads as well as precordial leads. 2) The STE in V1 and V2 has an R'-wave and downsloping ST segments, very atypical for STEMI. per year incidence of SCD in this cohort [1]. Bicarb 20, Lactate 4.2,
mm of ST segment elevation, V2 and V3 have 1 mm of elevation, v4 has 2 mm of elevation and v5 around 1.5 Note 1: Levels were significantly lower in takotsubo that presented with T-wave inversion. Reference on Troponins: Xenogiannis I, Vemmou E, Nikolakopoulos I, et al. Learning Points: 1. What do you think? V1 has 0.5
It does not meet STEMI criteria. Obvious STEMI(+) OMI of inferior, posterior, and lateral walls, now with likely 2nd degree heart block type 1 (Wenckebach). Learning Points: We can find OMI on ECG much sooner than STEMI criteria in many cases, and of course many OMIs never meet STEMI criteria at all.
Despite the clinical context, Cardiology was consulted due to concerns for a "STEMI". Hyperkalemia mimics STEMI and OMI in many distributions, but probably the most common is the Brugada morphology in V1-V2 which mimics anterior OMI for those who cannot recognize the Brugada pattern. Limb lead reversal can be easily recognized.
Easy LINK — [link] — My New E CG P odcasts ( 5/28/2024 ): These podcasts are part of the Mayo Clinic Cardiovascular CME Podcasts Series ( "Making Waves" ) — hosted by Dr. Anthony Kashou. 2:25 — Dr. Grauer: The 1st Error : Too many clinicians in 2024 are still stuck in the outdated millimeter-based STEMI Paradigm”.
I was relieved to see this MRI result: MRI IMPRESSION 1) Mildly decreased LV function with no focal wall motion abnormalities. Learning Points: 1. Cases of acute MI that were initially misdiagnosed as myo- or peri-carditis: 24 yo woman with chest pain: Is this STEMI? 2) Normal dimensions of all cardiac chambers. Pericarditis?
Not quite a STEMI, but same effect.) There is ST elevation in V2-V4 that does not quite meet "STEMI criteria." That is a reasonable thought, but we have shown that if there is one lead of V1-V4 with a T/QRS ratio greater than 0.36, then it is STEMI, not LV aneurysm. Is this a transient STEMI? Learning Points: 1.
Anterior STEMI? Regarding the History: It sounds from the History as if this patient has at least a significant component of EIA ( E xercise- I nduced A sthma ). Dr. T-wave inversions and dynamic ST elevation Tachycardia, hyperthyroid, and ST elevation. What is it? Activate the Cath Lab?
EMS recorded these prehospital ECGs: Time 0: In V2-V4, there is ST elevation that does not meet STEMI "criteria," of 1.5 If you use something like the HEART score: 1. E EKG: a negative ECG (score = 0) 3. She was having a transient STEMI, briefly. Learning Points : 1. She called 911. A Age: = 0 4. It was stented.
More specific information such as definitive RV diastolic collapse was not indicated or available at this time given the obvious clinical context. 1 week later (about 1 week prior to the tamponade visit) she had a follow up outpatient visit and this ECG was recorded: Appears to show resolving findings. mm STE depression in aVL.
The PMCardio Queen of Hearts app asks you, before giving an interpretation of OMI ("STEMI-Equivalent"), whether the patient's clinical presentation is high risk for OMI. Here are 9 cases that involve re-occlusion. If no, then she will tell you that the case is outside of the intended use group.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content